Electric motor housings reliably enter large-scale production

Design variant and performance requirement - these two keywords point the way in the development of electric motors.
The development of electric motors is clearly moving towards integration. Modern designs encase the electric motor, power electronics and gearbox in one central housing. When used as drive systems in vehicles, electric motors need to maintain their performance across a wide range of temperatures. Weight and efficiency play a major role. Highly automated, large-volume production that is as cost-effective as possible is another factor in the automotive industry. 

Internal combustion engines have been optimised to suit these criteria for decades. Things that are commonplace for these engines and related components are now presenting new challenges when it comes to components for electric motors. Comparing an electric motor housing to a grearbox housing illustrates this fact: The housing for an electric motor needs to be manufactured within much tighter tolerances than a gearbox housing, as accuracy is pivotal in determining the efficiency of the motor. Furthermore, the electric motor housing usually has much thinner walls than a conventional gearbox housing owing to its integrated cooling channels. There are also bearing bushes pressed into some of these housings. This results in mixed machining, which is not easy to master.

Although these aspects can often be managed without too much difficulty in prototype production, they present a real challenge in large-scale production. That applies not only with regard to ensuring compliance with all tolerances, but also in terms of process costs. In addition to the bearing bore, machining the stator bore is especially challenging with its a large diameter and considerable depth.

Due to their bell-like shape, the thin-walled electric motor housings are prone to natural oscillation. For this reason, and because of casting-related stresses in the part, particular attention needs to be paid to the clamping setup and the various machining operations. During clamping setup for the part, it should be ensured that the radial forces are low so that the eventual outcome of machining, especially the cylindrical form, is not negatively affected.

Whereas the radial stock removal at the bore entrance is roughly 0.5 mm, the draft angles caused by casting result in material build-up measuring up to 13 mm in diameter forming at the bottom of the bore. This results in significant machining forces acting on the part and the tool, and these need to be taken into account in process and tool design.

It is not unusual for stator bores to measure up to 300 mm in diameter. Machining this type of bore cost-effectively therefore calls for large tool diameters and long tool projection lengths. At such proportions, both the weight of the tool and its moment of tilt have a decisive impact on the machining process and can be limited by the requirements of machine tool and tool gripper. The tools should therefore be made as lightweight as possible.

One possible means of reduce weight and moment of tilt comes in the form of special tool designs, for example with innovative, additive manufacturing methods and the resulting ultra-lightweight designs. This not only enables customisable cooling channel design, but also allows enormous amounts of weight to be saved as a result of the geometric freedom that it opens up and the option to have hollow interiors. 

Thanks to the weight savings, it is possible to devise machining approaches for smaller machine connections, such as the HSK-A63. After all, only comparably low-weight tools with large diameters can be machined on less powerful equipment. Meanwhile, to make it easier to machine large diameters on machining centres with smaller tool connections, it is possible to reduce the number of teeth on the tool and thus the machining volume or the cutting torque. However, that comes at the expense of cycle time.

These options are particularly important because most of the existing machining centres in the automotive industry are fitted with HSK-A63 connections. One way of meeting the new requirements for parts for electric vehicles is to retrofit existing machine pools accordingly. A multi-machine approach is recommended for many machining processes. With smaller spindles, it is possible to work more flexibly and up to 15% more quickly than with HSK-A100 spindles. In ideal cases, machining centres with HSK-A63 connections should be used for all-round machining; for machining stator bores, however, machines with HSK-A100 connections are preferred. In each case, the connection on the machine side has a fundamental impact on tool design. That is because the number of teeth on the tool in question is chosen on the basis of the maximum possible torque and cutting power. As a general rule, the greater the number of teeth, the shorter the cycle times and the more powerful the machine and spindle need to be.

Machining of the housing is ultimately subject to tight tolerances with regard to 

• the concentricity of the bearing and stator bores, 
• the perpendicularity of the bores to the reference surface 
• the roundness and cylindrical form of the stator bore and bearing seat. 

In addition to the tolerances, the Al-Si alloys usually used for electric motor housings impose particular requirements on the machining process. Depending on the composition, machining these alloys can sometimes produce very long chips. However, these are undesirable for any machining process and must be avoided as they may result in wear on the part and tool as well as an increase in torque or the temperature of the part. The temperature of the chips is usually in excess of 100 degrees Celsius, and the heat needs to be extracted along with the chips. To meet this requirement reliably, MAPAL has used the finite element method (FEM) to develop special chip guiding stages and chip breaker geometries.

Another challenge involved in highly accurate housing machining is that of parts becoming distorted due to differences in temperature. These are far from rare owing to the thermal expansion characteristics of aluminium. For example, when the temperature changes by 5 °C, a solid shaft with a diameter of 219 mm will expand by 0.026 mm. That may not seem very much at first glance, but it is actually quite a lot given the tolerances that need to be complied with during machining. This expansion roughly corresponds to the full diameter and shape tolerance of an electric motor housing. Fluctuations in temperature can be reduced if an emulsion cooling lubricant is applied or, in some cases, via the appropriate chip removal if minimum quantity lubrication is used. Adjusting cutting parameters and feed rates is another option.

MAPAL has developed various designs for tools that meet the aforementioned requirements which are used on a daily basis. These include lightweight and yet stable tools in welded design that are highly suited to machining the thin walls of the housing. For the welded designs, the tool body takes the form of a tube. One of these tools weighs just half as much as a conventional boring bar. The carriers for the cutting edges and guide pads, if applicable, are welded on and support each other by means of connecting ribs. This minimises the risk of chattering. It also ensures that support is provided in the event of interrupted cuts. The bending section modulus is excellent thanks to the tubular design and the stabilising ribs. Despite long projection lengths and large diameters, the tools are highly accurate. To achieve this, the MAPAL specialists use extensive analyses based on the finite element method (FEM) to investigate coolant distribution, machining forces, torque and moment of tilt. 

Ausschlaggebend für die Auslegung des Werkzeugs für die Vorbearbeitung ist in den meisten Fällen die Bearbeitungsmaschine. Die erste Wahl für MAPAL ist ein Aufbohrwerkzeug mit Kurzklemmhaltern und PKD-bestückten Wendeschneidplatten. Dieses Werkzeug arbeitet mit hohen Schnittgeschwindigkeiten und Vorschüben und erzielt schnell und damit wirtschaftlich einen hohen Materialabtrag. Allerdings erfordert es eine Maschine mit hohem maximalem Drehmoment und entsprechender Leistung.

Ist eine solche Maschine nicht verfügbar, kann die Statorbohrung mit einem ISO-Helixfräser mit PKD-bestückten Wendeschneidplatten vorgefräst werden. Der Helixfräser erreicht ebenfalls sehr hohe Schnittdaten; allerdings ist die Bearbeitungszeit durch den größeren Bearbeitungsweg deutlich länger.

Auch bei der Semi-Finishbearbeitung liegt der Fokus auf dem Drehmoment und der Leistung der Maschine. Das Semi-Finishwerkzeug bearbeitet den aufwendigen Konturzug des E-Motorgehäuses so vor, dass die abschließende Fertigbearbeitung in einem Arbeitsgang prozesssicher gelingt. Ein Präzisionsaufbohrwerkzeug mit PKD-bestückten ISO-Wendeschneidplatten ist hier das Werkzeug der Wahl.

Das Finishwerkzeug stellt die komplette Kontur mit Fasen und radialen Übergängen innerhalb einer Toleranz von wenigen µm her. Um höchste Genauigkeit zu erreichen, ist das Feinbohrwerkzeug mit feinjustierbaren PKD-bestückten Schneidplatten ausgestattet. Führungsleisten gewährleisten eine optimale Abstützung in der Bohrung.

Einige Varianten der Elektromotorengehäuse weisen eine eingepresste Stahlbuchse für die Lagerung der Rotorwelle auf. Dabei wird zunächst der Sitz der Buchse bearbeitet und während des Prozesses eine Buchse eingepresst. Aufgrund der hohen Anforderungen an Koaxialität von Lagerbohrung und Statorbohrung bearbeitet anschließend ein Kombinationswerkzeug beide Bohrungen fertig. Dabei zerspant ein Teil des Werkzeugs die Stahlbuchse, der restliche Teil gleichzeitig die Statorbohrung aus Aluminium. Diese sogenannte Mischbearbeitung stellt Werkzeughersteller vor mehrere Herausforderungen: Sie müssen zum einen die Stahlspäne prozesssicher vom Aluminiumbereich fernhalten, um nicht die Bauteiloberfläche oder die PKD-Führungsleisten des Werkzeugs zu beschädigen. Zum anderen unterscheiden sich die beiden Materialien grundsätzlich – in der Wahl der Schnittgeschwindigkeiten oder der zu erwartenden Standzeiten der Schneiden.

Eine spezielle Spanleitstufe, eine optimierte Kühlmittelführung sowie geöffnete Spanräume stellen in der MAPAL Bearbeitungslösung sicher, dass die Stahlspäne prozesssicher nach vorne abtransportiert werden. Die Aluminiumspäne hingegen führt das Werkzeug durch eine eigens ausgelegte Rückspülung nach hinten ab. Die MAPAL Lösung verfügt darüber hinaus über einen sogenannten Protektionsschild, der zusätzlich sicherstellt, dass die Stahlspäne im vorderen Bereich bleiben (siehe Bild oben, Werkzeug 3).

Wie aber den unterschiedlichen Schnittwerten und Standzeiten begegnen? Für Aluminium empfehlen die Spezialisten eine Schnittgeschwindigkeit von 800 m/min; für Stahl nur 200 m/min. Und während eine PKD-bestückte Schneide 6.000 bis 8.000 Aluminium-Bauteile bearbeitet, liegt die Schneidenstandzeit in der Stahlbearbeitung, in der Regel Cermet, bei nur 250 bis 300 Bauteilen. Die Lösung sind Wendeschneidplatten. Vor Ort auswechselbar, können beide Schneidentypen bis zu ihrem Standzeitende im Einsatz bleiben.

MAPAL recommends to machine large diameters with boring and fine boring. Besides, there is yet another option for machining stator bores: finish boring. In the application example, two finish boring tools with one PCD-tipped insert each for roughing and finishing machine a stator bore with a part length of 200 mm, a target diameter of 220 mm and a blank diameter of 215.7 mm. The productive machining time is around five minutes.

In the machining process recommended by the MAPAL specialists with boring and fine boring, the tools feature eight and four PCD-tipped cutting edges. Instead of five minutes, machining takes just under 0.48 minutes and is therefore much more efficient. The system with three different machining steps is already being used in practice and delivering good results. The required, tight tolerances for concentricity, roundness and cylindrical form are reliably maintained to within just a few micrometres even in large-scale production.