Efficient deburring with robots

The story of Nürtingen-based KADIA Produktion GmbH + Co began back in 1959 with the production of honing tools. The first honing machines were developed ten years later. The company tapped into another branch of business in 1981 with the manufacture of deburring machines. Today, KADIA is a leading specialist in honing and deburring technology and currently employs 200 people.

Its main customers are car manufacturers and suppliers, construction and agricultural machinery manufacturers, wind power plant producers and the aerospace industry. While the manufacturer offers standard machinery in different sizes for honing, in principle, custom machines are built for deburring. Customers include major machine manufacturers that bring KADIA on board as a deburring expert.

In mechanical machining, a distinction is made between loose and fixed burrs. After deburring, depending on what’s required, the part should have sharp edges, edge rounding or a chamfer, which is why this is also known as edge design. To assess a burr, KADIA uses a simple but meaningful test using the lead of a mechanical pencil extended by five millimetres. If it can be used to remove the burr, then the burr is loose. If the lead breaks, it’s a fixed burr, which needs to either be milled off or can be left in place, as it won’t come off later.

The size of the workpiece is also crucial to machining processes that make use of robots. Guiding the workpiece is favoured for smaller parts. The robot guides the workpiece along fixed processing units. In a tool-guided strategy, the robot arm processes a workpiece firmly clamped in place. “For bigger workpieces, I’m much more skilful with the milling cutter in hand than if I have to move the bulky part,” explains Jannik Weiss, Sales Specialist Deburring & Robotics at KADIA.

The centrepiece of development at KADIA is a five-by-six-metre test cell with a six-axle industrial robot and a quick-release unit. This enables testing of what is set to go on to become the system. Preliminary tests determine the optimum cutting data and assess stability. The cell is home to 15 changeable units. The robot has automated access with an action radius of 2.70 m to nine of these. Each unit represents a specific function that is used for machining a part. Typically, it consists of a motor spindle with a connection and a cutting tool.

A rotary table as the seventh axle is also part of the equipment of the test cell, which also has enough space to accommodate other systems, such as coolant supply or additional process units. At KADIA, several parts are equipped for various tests in the cell at the same time.

For initial preliminary tests on a dummy part for the battery tray, KADIA used a round-insert milling cutter already in stock in. The tool proved wholly unsuitable for the task. The vibrations that occurred were so severe that even the processing spindle was damaged. Even with low cutting values, the background noise during milling was still noticeable in the adjacent building.

With the task to deliver a suitable milling cutter for the aluminium housing, MAPAL was chosen as the partner of choice. “We evaluate in advance in which tool manufacturer we see the potential for cooperation,” says Jannik Weiss. Although KADIA initially focuses on standard tools, it was a major plus for MAPAL that the tool manufacturer produces custom tools where necessary.

But Norbert Meier, who wanted to show the customer an alternative with the second milling cutter, had reckoned with this outcome. “We specially developed our FlyCutter for requirements like these,” he explains. MAPAL developed the lightweight tool specifically for unstable machining requirements that occur in robot applications. It is optimised for small connections such as BT30. The innovative design and use of aluminium ensure the milling head is particularly lightweight. With the diameter of 63 millimetres used at KADIA, the PCD milling head, including milling inserts, weighs just 220 grams.

The sensitive wedge adjustment make µ-precise adjustment of the milling inserts possible. The dovetail guide and an additional worm screw ensure perfect seating and high accuracy of repetition for the assembly of the milling inserts. The special, ultra-positive cutting edge geometry means only weak forces are applied to the part and the tool spindle guided by the robot.

When machining the battery tray, accuracy down to the µm is not required. In fact, to ensure the sealant applied by the automotive manufacturer holds better, a certain rawness of the surface is needed. Only the waviness must not be too high. In the tests, the milling cutter was moved beyond the limit to determine up to which point chatter marks on the relatively thin part still lay within the required tolerance.

「ロボット加工の核心は、工具、治具、ロボットの相互作用です」とノルベルト・マイヤー氏は説明します。剛性は加工における基本的な問題です。ロボットアームが伸びれば伸びるほど、加工は不安定になります。そのためKADIAは様々な切削データをテストするだけでなく、ワークの前や横などのロボットの様々な位置もテストします。

このケースでは、主軸回転数11,000 rpmでの最適な切削データは、送り0.16 m/s、材料除去率0.5 mmであるとパートナーは判断しました。Fly Cutterは非常に優れた表面品質を確実に実現しました。KADIA社はこのテストデータをカスタムマシンのコンセプトに組み込みました。このためメーカーは、1つのセルに3台のロボットを使用することが、連続生産において最もコスト効率の良いソリューションになると判断しました。2台が前面加工を分担し、3台目が背面加工を行います。切削データに加え、KADIA社 は加工ステップの所要時間と達成可能なサイクルタイムを顧客に提供します。従って大型バッテリートレイのバリ取りには約80秒かかります。「ロボット加工では、このような切削データのプロセス情報はCNCマシンのように標準的なものではありません。ロボットの位置によって、同じデータでも異なる結果が得られます。」とヤニック・ヴァイス氏は話します。

KADIAとMAPALは、この好結果を受け、さらに協力関係を深めたいと考えています。様々な加工プロセスに対する更なるテストが既に計画されています。